07-27-2025, 10:56 PM
To the TTT Admin Team,
I am writing on behalf of my client, Frost, regarding the permanent ban issued for mass RDM. While the rule infraction is not in dispute, I respectfully request that the context and intent behind his actions be given fair consideration in evaluating the proportionality of the punishment.
At the time of the incident, a trial moderator—someone who holds a position of responsibility and is expected to model proper gameplay—was actively delaying the round. This behavior, especially from someone in a staff position, negatively impacted the experience of all players on the server. Prolonged rounds due to intentional delaying disrupt the flow of the game and frustrate the player base, as many are simply trying to enjoy a fair and active TTT session.
Frost’s decision to eliminate the remaining players was not made with malicious intent, but rather out of an impulsive attempt to reset the game and restore fun and momentum for everyone involved. He acknowledges this action broke the rules, but it was done in protest of the delay and in an effort to improve the experience for others—not to grief or ruin the server.
We also ask that the staff team reflect on the conduct of the trial moderator in question. If a player—especially one in a staff role—is abusing the game mechanics to delay and provoke frustration, this should be addressed with equal seriousness.
Frost is not a habitual rulebreaker. A permanent ban in this case feels excessive given the situation and his overall history. We respectfully request that the ban be reduced to a time-served suspension or temporary ban, along with a warning placed on record if necessary.
Thank you for your time and for considering a fair and balanced review of this situation.
Respectfully,
Fanta
Defense Advocate for Frost
I am writing on behalf of my client, Frost, regarding the permanent ban issued for mass RDM. While the rule infraction is not in dispute, I respectfully request that the context and intent behind his actions be given fair consideration in evaluating the proportionality of the punishment.
At the time of the incident, a trial moderator—someone who holds a position of responsibility and is expected to model proper gameplay—was actively delaying the round. This behavior, especially from someone in a staff position, negatively impacted the experience of all players on the server. Prolonged rounds due to intentional delaying disrupt the flow of the game and frustrate the player base, as many are simply trying to enjoy a fair and active TTT session.
Frost’s decision to eliminate the remaining players was not made with malicious intent, but rather out of an impulsive attempt to reset the game and restore fun and momentum for everyone involved. He acknowledges this action broke the rules, but it was done in protest of the delay and in an effort to improve the experience for others—not to grief or ruin the server.
We also ask that the staff team reflect on the conduct of the trial moderator in question. If a player—especially one in a staff role—is abusing the game mechanics to delay and provoke frustration, this should be addressed with equal seriousness.
Frost is not a habitual rulebreaker. A permanent ban in this case feels excessive given the situation and his overall history. We respectfully request that the ban be reduced to a time-served suspension or temporary ban, along with a warning placed on record if necessary.
Thank you for your time and for considering a fair and balanced review of this situation.
Respectfully,
Fanta
Defense Advocate for Frost