[Nazu(s)]

Nothing I’ve seen you say comes close to anything I’ve seen current staff say. I’d just chill out with the edginess in discord and I think you’d do well. You were one of the individuals I really was hoping would make some tweaks and go for staff and I can recognize your efforts in doing that, with that said you’ve got my +1

Literally 1984

[grif]

+0, I don’t know you too well, but I’m all for more staff. There are many times when there isn’t staff on and chaos ensues. I can say though with certainty I remember playing a while ago with you and the few times I’ve played with you recently your behavior has definitely improved. I’m not going to speak on any of the previously mentioned issues that others mentioned as they do not involve me, but it appears there may be some things that may need to be ironed out before others believe you are fit for staff. Good luck!

[tiefling lesbian]

burp

[♥Chloe♥]

burp

excuse you

[Ckg]

Can't comment for behavior on server, and don't really care about discord actions.  But, I think what Skullfire brought up is an important point.  A good amount of your responses in this thread cross the threshold of what could be reasonably argued as defending yourself.  It seems like any time you get called out on something you do defend yourself, but then you also get into petty dick-measuring contests whenever you can.  For example, instead of defending yourself against Skullfire you instead chose to attack him and then spent 90% of the interaction going after him.  Then there was Quantum who you couldn't resist getting a little dig in at in your response when you said: " I barely see you on the server so I thought you were another donor at the time as no warning was given to the micspammer."  You enjoy starting fights/belittling people and are unable to take criticism without dishing it back towards the person who voiced their concerns in an inappropriate manner.  I do not think you will be able to effectively staff until you can get that under control, since you will inevitably face a lot of criticism, much more than you do now as a regular player.

-1

[tiefling lesbian]

Can't comment for behavior on server, and don't really care about discord actions.  But, I think what Skullfire brought up is an important point.  A good amount of your responses in this thread cross the threshold of what could be reasonably argued as defending yourself.  It seems like any time you get called out on something you do defend yourself, but then you also get into petty dick-measuring contests whenever you can.  For example, instead of defending yourself against Skullfire you instead chose to attack him and then spent 90% of the interaction going after him.  Then there was Quantum who you couldn't resist getting a little dig in at in your response when you said: " I barely see you on the server so I thought you were another donor at the time as no warning was given to the micspammer."  You enjoy starting fights/belittling people and are unable to take criticism without dishing it back towards the person who voiced their concerns in an inappropriate manner.  I do not think you will be able to effectively staff until you can get that under control, since you will inevitably face a lot of criticism, much more than you do now as a regular player.

-1

Like I mentioned before, they aren't digs at anyone, they're just examples and context. I've already explained the first, and the second wasn't to belittle quantum but to explain why I hadn't recognized him as staff. Didn't even say he was never on, just that I hadn't personally seen him much.

[voidzz]

+0,, nobody knows when youre joking and serious due to ur general demeanor

lots of unnecessarily long comments on this post, the only reason im not +1 is bc kaiwan is right, you seem very impatient and would deal with situations too swift sometimes

ur getting better tho

---

also unfortunately, lots of hypocrites in here with regards to ur jokes etc, just gotta learn to be careful to whom you pick to joke w bc a lot of ppl on here will do shit like slur in pm then warn you when you slur in theirs (analogy to these jokes)

[tiefling lesbian]

+0,, nobody knows when youre joking and serious due to ur general demeanor

lots of unnecessarily long comments on this post, the only reason im not +1 is bc kaiwan is right, you seem very impatient and would deal with situations too swift sometimes

ur getting better tho

---

also unfortunately, lots of hypocrites in here with regards to ur jokes etc, just gotta learn to be careful to whom you pick to joke w bc a lot of ppl on here will do shit like slur in pm then warn you when you slur in theirs (analogy to these jokes)

I will use tone indicators from now on to avoid any confusion. /srs

[Ckg]

*snip*

Like I mentioned before, they aren't digs at anyone, they're just examples and context. 

Except they are and the fact you aren't willing to admit and instead would rather dig your head deeper in the sand shows that you aren't ready for staffing.  Just look at birddog, it took you 4 replies to say sorry and admit that you were wrong and apologize. In fact, I suspect you don't actually care and just apologized so it would look good because you then went after him again in his response to Cimag, trying to equate you wishing death on his kid, a directed attack, to him joking about killing people in general, which, apart from being just a false equivalency, shows you didn't actually learn from what was said.

Then look at Skullfire, you took 1 reply before you brought up Kaiwan in an attempt to make Skullfire look bad. It is a thread about you not him, you spent 1.5 replies defending yourself and 4.5 attacking Skullfire and other staff members. You brought up a completely irrelevant event that is a discussion for another thread in an attempt to malign the characters of those who don't agree with you.  That is not defending yourself, that is attacking other members of the community and you know that, and if not then it just brings forward more character issues of not being self-aware enough to realize when you are attacking which, if you get staff, will cause more harm than good. I seriously wonder if anyone continuing to give you a +1 after is able to look past their friendship with you and their desire to have a friend staffing with them and see the serious personality issues that you being staff would bring.  If you are staff you will end up causing more harm than good through your inability to accept criticism in a healthy way and I am 100% confident in that.

[tiefling lesbian]

*snip*

snip

Except they are and the fact you aren't willing to admit and instead would rather dig your head deeper in the sand shows that you aren't ready for staffing.  Just look at birddog, it took you 4 replies to say sorry and admit that you were wrong and apologize. In fact, I suspect you don't actually care and just apologized so it would look good because you then went after him again in his response to Cimag, trying to equate you wishing death on his kid, a directed attack, to him joking about killing people in general, which, apart from being just a false equivalency, shows you didn't actually learn from what was said.

Then look at Skullfire, you took 1 reply before you brought up Kaiwan in an attempt to make Skullfire look bad. It is a thread about you not him, you spent 1.5 replies defending yourself and 4.5 attacking Skullfire and other staff members. You brought up a completely irrelevant event that is a discussion for another thread in an attempt to malign the characters of those who don't agree with you.  That is not defending yourself, that is attacking other members of the community and you know that, and if not then it just brings forward more character issues of not being self-aware enough to realize when you are attacking which, if you get staff, will cause more harm than good. I seriously wonder if anyone continuing to give you a +1 after is able to look past their friendship with you and their desire to have a friend staffing with them and see the serious personality issues that you being staff would bring.  If you are staff you will end up causing more harm than good through your inability to accept criticism in a healthy way and I am 100% confident in that.

Again, no, providing context to a situation is not attacking anyone. The topic dragged on longer than intended, but that still doesn't make it an attack. As I said before, it was an example of common behavior that is similar or worse to what I was being accused of, with that particular example being chosen as it was the most relevant to parties involved. Further posts were to include evidence of it happening and to explain the same thing I'm having to explain again now. The point isn't to make skullfire "look bad", it's to compare what i'm being accused of to the behavior of of other staff, including the person accusing me.

The same goes for birddog. The included examples are relevant to the context in which the joke was made, and were evidence in contrary to his claim that he never makes similar jokes, which is again relevant as it falsely implies there was no previously established precedent. As I have already said, the joke was over the line, but it was still made within specific context and was not a randomly occurring event that would have happened anywhere else.

As I mentioned before, I HAVE accepted criticism and observably improved upon it, as commented on by multiple people in this thread. I have no problem with criticism so long as it is honest, accurate, and substantial, but I have every right to point out when claims against me are leaving out relevant information or being made in bad faith.

While I enjoy hanging out on the server with most of the people who have +1d, I'm not particularly close friends with them, and even people I've had conflict with in the past have +1d or +0d, so I'm not sure what point you're trying to make there. The accusations you're so confident in seem to be formed almost entirely on a handful of forum posts, as I've rarely seen you on the server at the same time as me or interacted much with you there (again, not a dig, just a relevant observation you seemed to agree with in your first post). It's possible that the people who have +1d me have simply not found the "serious personality issues" you accuse me of to be accurate or significant in their experiences with me on the server.