(01-08-2020, 04:27 PM)Futa Renamon Wrote: [ -> ]Offender's Name: Björn Ironside
Offender's SteamID: (STEAM_0:1:71620595)
Potential Witnesses: @"Cake"
Reason to Ban: rdm and leave without serving slay
Proof: https://media.discordapp.net/attachments...height=983
if i remember correctly hani told me u need evidence of the shotlogs
(01-08-2020, 04:44 PM)Meeemo Wrote: [ -> ] (01-08-2020, 04:27 PM)Futa Renamon Wrote: [ -> ]Offender's Name: Björn Ironside
Offender's SteamID: (STEAM_0:1:71620595)
Potential Witnesses: @"Cake"
Reason to Ban: rdm and leave without serving slay
Proof: https://media.discordapp.net/attachments...height=983
if i remember correctly hani told me u need evidence of the shotlogs
Yes, damagelogs. Not Rdm and leave without both parts. The leave part is included here but not the Rdm.
(01-08-2020, 04:53 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ] (01-08-2020, 04:44 PM)Meeemo Wrote: [ -> ] (01-08-2020, 04:27 PM)Futa Renamon Wrote: [ -> ]Offender's Name: Björn Ironside
Offender's SteamID: (STEAM_0:1:71620595)
Potential Witnesses: @"Cake"
Reason to Ban: rdm and leave without serving slay
Proof: https://media.discordapp.net/attachments...height=983
if i remember correctly hani told me u need evidence of the shotlogs
Yes, damagelogs. Not Rdm and leave without both parts. The leave part is included here but not the Rdm.
I had been told by someone (i dont remember who) that if they were slain then and they left they only needed proof of slay that is not served to ban
also @
Mrporky02 is the one who handled the report as I was the one who was rdmed on my t round
No It’s Rdm and leave. Both needed. If they were to appeal and see this ban request as evidence used they could use it to their advantage for missing part. What if it wasn’t actually Rdm they were slayed for? How do we know it was Rdm? What if it was a “joke slay?” Etc. Too many unanswered and disputable questions that are good to squash at the time of banning. We ban based on hard evidence, not assumptions. All parts are needed and it’s not that hard to collect both. We ALWAYS want sufficient evidence that covers all parts and beyond a reasonable doubt is the goal.
If the staff on can confirm it then sure. Seeing as porky was the one who handled the report it would have to be him
If i remember staff take screenshots of reports after handling
Some. It’s not required and the sheer amount of reports, which could be like 20 a map... I have a few hundred photos of ban or like rdm and leave alone, even after I learned how to get them in one ss. Now some staff are animals and record the whole time the play so I guess it depends.
It's been over a day and would be unfair to ban at this point. Take notes for next time.