Dinkleberg's GMod

Nobody in voice chat was talking. I tried to get people to talk. He gagged me but I didn't break any server rules. "Annoying" is not a valid reason to gag when I'm trying to get a lobby full of 15 people to talk and instead of talking, he gags me, then tries to start a conversation with others and surprise, the only guy who would talk, he just gagged and with no warning and more than just a round gag 

 My screenshot is over the upload limit
Offender's Name: Tamber

Offender's SteamID: 76561198436816120

What Server(s): Dinkleberg's

Offender's Rank: Donor

What They Did: Permagagged me

When They Did It: During round 2 or 3 of a map

Potential Witnesses:

Proof (You must have VIDEO and/or Multiple Screenshots as proof*): it says i can't upload the images but I have screenshots of me being gagged in chat with no warning

Other:

The PH staff team has been notified of this, well get back to you in a bit.

From the discord

If you were gagged for something you said over voice, then how does one screenshot of chat provide the proper context?
Based on the evidence currently provided of course, idk if you have more, but realistically it's easier to look more genuine if video evidence is utilised.

Steam ID is STEAM_0:0:238275196

Hi all


is there literally any other context for this that was recorded? its not really possible for us to go off of word of mouth, and there could have been many different circumstances surrounding it.


therefore, as of this time, I am not really sure there is anything actionable off of this?

Like Sad say, if it is a VC gag then it's best to get a video of the event instead of SS. An SS is more suitable for a chat gag/mute while a recording is best for VC gag.

Realistically it should be on the punishing staff to have a recording of the incident..............

the offender in question is a donor, not a staff.

realistically, after playing with you, all I can say is that I am more unsure about how truthful your word is.

Since there is no video to add context, I would be very much in favor of reaching out to the other person and asking what happened. because, my dude, there is context here we are missing and I think going off of just your presented image is not exactly 100% trustworthy.


edit: after reading chat log, I really think that everyone would need to hear from tamber first before anything will happen.

As I alluded to before, I can corroborate your abrasive behavior that tamber mentioned to tronald. So there is that.