![]() |
|
Calling a SUS in OT - Printable Version +- Dinkleberg's GMod (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site) +-- Forum: Community (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +--- Thread: Calling a SUS in OT (/showthread.php?tid=440) |
RE: Calling a SUS in OT - Daggergrace - 02-06-2017 he called a sus, for being quiet which is what got me killed, you should always state the real sus if you had that option, but when you blatantly only call the sus for being quiet, than moments later that person is killed, you are at fault, regardless of what info you really had, because you only called the sus for quietness, I already have another mod's approval, either it was Setro or someone else, that that is not allowed. Okay i get that now but, two of my reports are getting mixed up here. 1. I was kosed for being quiet 2. KOSed for entering a "claimed area" which was not stated to be claimed, and the only remark i got was, "don't come in our area". I checked the chat, nothing, and the Detective attempted to kill me. RE: Calling a SUS in OT - Mr_Rippe - 02-06-2017 (02-06-2017, 11:55 AM)DaggerGrace Wrote: he called a sus, for being quiet which is what got me killed, you should always state the real sus if you had that option, but when you blatantly only call the sus for being quiet, than moments later that person is killed, you are at fault, regardless of what info you really had, because you only called the sus for quietness, I already have another mod's approval, either it was Setro or someone else, that that is not allowed. It was OT, you were the only person out of sight when manhacks were released. The KOS was good. Whoever said it was not good is wrong. RE: Calling a SUS in OT - Daggergrace - 02-06-2017 the sus that got me killed was for being quiet, he mentioned nothing about that...he called the sus and essentially the KOS for being quiet, not for manhacks RE: Calling a SUS in OT - ❤ Miss Mari ❤ - 02-06-2017 (02-06-2017, 12:10 PM)DaggerGrace Wrote: the sus that got me killed was for being quiet, he mentioned nothing about that...he called the sus and essentially the KOS for being quiet, not for manhacks http://imgur.com/a/lKtw0 RE: Calling a SUS in OT - Daggergrace - 02-06-2017 MARI I DONT CARE WHAT HE SAID IN CHAT!!! THE SUS HE PUT ON ME WAS FOR BEING QUIET AND DURING THE SUS THAT GOT ME KILLED!!!!! HE SAID NOTHING ABOUT MANHACKS OR RADAR!! HE PUT THE SUS ON ME FOR BEING QUIET AND ONLY MENTIONED HE HAD RADAR AFTER I GOT KILLED. IT DOESNT MATTER WHAT HE HAD!!! HIS SUS WAS FOR BEING QUIET!! NOT FOR BEING NEAR MANHACKS LAUNCHING, FOR BEING QUIET, IF HE SAID "Sus on dagger for being near a manhacks location, I have a radar.", IT WOULD HAVE BEEN FINE BUT HE GOT ME KILLED FOR BEING QUIET!! IT NEVER MATTERS WHAT YOU SAY AFTER, IF HE HAD A VALID REASON TO SUS ME IT SHOULD'VE BEEN MENTIONED WHEN HE CALLED IT, NOT AFTER!!!!!!!! wouldn't you agree if I had valid reason to call sus, I should say it before the susable person is killed, not after? basically it went down like this. 1. Sus on dagger for being quiet 2. (dies) 3. My real sus was because you were near manhacks. call the real reason RE: Calling a SUS in OT - Everyjuan - 02-06-2017 can you not type so loud please? kthx. RE: Calling a SUS in OT - ❤ Miss Mari ❤ - 02-06-2017 (02-06-2017, 12:18 PM)DaggerGrace Wrote: MARI I DONT CARE WHAT HE SAID IN CHAT!!! THE SUS HE PUT ON ME WAS FOR BEING QUIET AND DURING THE SUS THAT GOT ME KILLED!!!!! HE SAID NOTHING ABOUT MANHACKS OR RADAR!! HE PUT THE SUS ON ME FOR BEING QUIET AND ONLY MENTIONED HE HAD RADAR AFTER I GOT KILLED. IT DOESNT MATTER WHAT HE HAD!!! HIS SUS WAS FOR BEING QUIET!! NOT FOR BEING NEAR MANHACKS LAUNCHING, FOR BEING QUIET, IF HE SAID "Sus on dagger for being near a manhacks location, I have a radar.", IT WOULD HAVE BEEN FINE BUT HE GOT ME KILLED FOR BEING QUIET!! IT NEVER MATTERS WHAT YOU SAY AFTER, IF HE HAD A VALID REASON TO SUS ME IT SHOULD'VE BEEN MENTIONED WHEN HE CALLED IT, NOT AFTER!!!!!!!! Dagger, his real sus reason was valid regardless of when he called it o3o, this thread has long reached its conclusion and is turning into pointless arguing, someone close it please... RE: Calling a SUS in OT - Daggergrace - 02-06-2017 actually mari it does matter when it was called, because for all everyone knows, he was lying. RE: Calling a SUS in OT - Daggergrace - 02-06-2017 I'm not even arguing to get him slayed anymore, I want people to learn these things, call the valid sus when you have it, why would you even make a sus such as that? I'm going to react the same way, valid or not, it just makes no sense. aww come on feel love already. It's how i show effection.... RE: Calling a SUS in OT - Mr_Rippe - 02-06-2017 (02-06-2017, 12:40 PM)DaggerGrace Wrote: actually mari it does matter when it was called, because for all everyone knows, he was lying. Di... did you just insinuate that the DETECTIVE, who is a regular player here (but this is irrelevant), would lie about a KOS? ![]() You're wrong. You're so wrong it hurts. My body is in pain reading how wrong you are. I'm in class and I'm actively getting a headache reading how wrong you are.
|