Rules on Language - Printable Version +- Dinkleberg's GMod (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site) +-- Forum: Trouble in Terrorist Town (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: TTT Suggestions & Help (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Rules on Language (/showthread.php?tid=6364) |
RE: Rules on Language - Avocado Toast - 12-27-2018 (12-27-2018, 05:01 PM)Foxka Wrote: Why is it this hard not to be racist Thank you for your critical thinking and analysis. RE: Rules on Language - Seadub - 12-27-2018 (12-27-2018, 06:04 PM)Burrito Bowl Wrote:(12-27-2018, 05:01 PM)Foxka Wrote: Why is it this hard not to be racist He has a point. This server (really, this game (really, games in general)) has a tendency to attract edgy kids that want to spam racial slurs and just talk about blacks gays and women the whole time they're on. It's really annoying and yeah, surprising how hard it is for people to not be shitty, and that a thread about the ban of what should be the least controversial use of a word to ban is this much of a problem. RE: Rules on Language - Avocado Toast - 12-28-2018 (12-27-2018, 11:57 PM)Connar Wrote:Thank you for such good response to what I said, and a good outlook. Thank you.(12-27-2018, 06:04 PM)Burrito Bowl Wrote:(12-27-2018, 05:01 PM)Foxka Wrote: Why is it this hard not to be racist RE: Rules on Language - Hash - 12-28-2018 (12-27-2018, 01:35 PM)quicheman Wrote:(12-26-2018, 11:00 PM)Hash Wrote: It really isn't a issue at all. if people are spamming it then that a mute because its spam. if someone is repeatedly calling somebody a racial slur then that a mute cause it falls under harassment. If somebody says a racial slur and it doesn't fall under spamming or harassment then I don't see an issue. If its some edge lord flexing their superior sense of humor then just mute him. But It's not like that at all RE: Rules on Language - Henry - 12-31-2018 (12-27-2018, 03:44 PM)Scoovie Wrote:(12-27-2018, 03:09 PM)quicheman Wrote:(12-27-2018, 02:35 PM)nopleez Wrote:(12-27-2018, 01:33 PM)quicheman Wrote:(12-26-2018, 10:43 PM)nopleez Wrote: Either completely ban n word with hard r or completely allow it. It's silly to have a grey area where it is enforced for some people and not for others. So do you foresee the rule being changed? Banning it has exactly 0 negative side effects, and aside from that makes this server I should think more appealing. When it is used as a slur, i.e. with the hard R, it is intended to be offensive, and behavior like that contributes absolutely nothing to the community. Toxicity on the server is not desirable at all, and when a word has the sole purpose of hurting others, its a word that doesn't need to be used. RE: Rules on Language - Scoovie - 12-31-2018 (12-31-2018, 02:26 AM)Henry Wrote: So do you foresee the rule being changed? Banning it has exactly 0 negative side effects, and aside from that makes this server I should think more appealing. When it is used as a slur, i.e. with the hard R, it is intended to be offensive, and behavior like that contributes absolutely nothing to the community. Toxicity on the server is not desirable at all, and when a word has the sole purpose of hurting others, its a word that doesn't need to be used. It will most likely be reverted back in a month or so RE: Rules on Language - queef commando - 12-31-2018 This is basically a trial run and a reversion is likely, but we'll see how this goes. |