Dinkleberg's GMod
New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). - Printable Version

+- Dinkleberg's GMod (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site)
+-- Forum: Trouble in Terrorist Town (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: TTT Suggestions & Help (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). (/showthread.php?tid=20059)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6


RE: New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). - Dildo Shwaggins - 01-27-2025

Not sure if any of the current maps in rotation have anything like it, but would spamming something profoundly annoying that doesn't kill but is disruptive or irritating be KOSable too (e.g. lights anyone can activate)


RE: New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). - Insatiable Cockgobbler - 01-28-2025

Blocking someone from using a healer should be sus at minimum smh


RE: New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). - Ryan - 01-28-2025

(01-27-2025, 07:13 PM)TDawg4 Wrote: Made some changes based off of suggestions. Thinking of a good way to word that slays count once you serve it without adding a whole other sentence.
If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served (you may leave once the round of your last slay has started) unless you receive permission from staff to leave.

If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served unless you receive permission from staff to leave. Slays are considered to be served once the slay takes effect.

I can’t think of any way to make this shorter.


RE: New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). - Market Down - 01-28-2025

(01-28-2025, 11:50 AM)Ryan Wrote:
(01-27-2025, 07:13 PM)TDawg4 Wrote: Made some changes based off of suggestions. Thinking of a good way to word that slays count once you serve it without adding a whole other sentence.
If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served (you may leave once the round of your last slay has started) unless you receive permission from staff to leave.

If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served unless you receive permission from staff to leave. Slays are considered to be served once the slay takes effect.

I can’t think of any way to make this shorter.

If this is also a rules discussion as opposed to just MOTD- I am once again asking the reasoning behind this, especially with regular players? Would it not serve a better punishment to be slain at the beginning of my next session as opposed to the end of this one? It doesn't evade the punishment.


RE: New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). - Ryan - 01-28-2025

(01-28-2025, 12:03 PM)Market Down Wrote:
(01-28-2025, 11:50 AM)Ryan Wrote:
(01-27-2025, 07:13 PM)TDawg4 Wrote: Made some changes based off of suggestions. Thinking of a good way to word that slays count once you serve it without adding a whole other sentence.
If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served (you may leave once the round of your last slay has started) unless you receive permission from staff to leave.

If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served unless you receive permission from staff to leave. Slays are considered to be served once the slay takes effect.

I can’t think of any way to make this shorter.

If this is also a rules discussion as opposed to just MOTD- I am once again asking the reasoning behind this, especially with regular players? Would it not serve a better punishment to be slain at the beginning of my next session as opposed to the end of this one? It doesn't evade the punishment.
I’m with you, and I advocated for a change a bit ago (I’ll try to find the thread later). The main reason is for the people that come on, RDM, and then leave right away. For regulars that need or want to leave, tho, all it takes is a message to staff and we’ll most likely let you go. The only reason I could see permission being denied is if someone is doing it excessively or if they have multiple slays.


RE: New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). - TDawg4 - 01-28-2025

(01-28-2025, 12:03 PM)Market Down Wrote:
(01-28-2025, 11:50 AM)Ryan Wrote:
(01-27-2025, 07:13 PM)TDawg4 Wrote: Made some changes based off of suggestions. Thinking of a good way to word that slays count once you serve it without adding a whole other sentence.
If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served (you may leave once the round of your last slay has started) unless you receive permission from staff to leave.

If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served unless you receive permission from staff to leave. Slays are considered to be served once the slay takes effect.

I can’t think of any way to make this shorter.

If this is also a rules discussion as opposed to just MOTD- I am once again asking the reasoning behind this, especially with regular players? Would it not serve a better punishment to be slain at the beginning of my next session as opposed to the end of this one? It doesn't evade the punishment.
I am not completely closed off to it changing. But the main reason in my opinion is that the reason for the slay is to provide some closure/justice to the person who had their round ruined. When they see the slay they feel like the event is over and wont carry over the grudge to the next session. Also it is really easy to tell the staff member that slayed you that you have to leave right then and cant wait 5 minutes (for whatever reason).


RE: New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). - Market Down - 01-28-2025

(01-28-2025, 05:17 PM)TDawg4 Wrote:
(01-28-2025, 12:03 PM)Market Down Wrote:
(01-28-2025, 11:50 AM)Ryan Wrote:
(01-27-2025, 07:13 PM)TDawg4 Wrote: Made some changes based off of suggestions. Thinking of a good way to word that slays count once you serve it without adding a whole other sentence.
If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served (you may leave once the round of your last slay has started) unless you receive permission from staff to leave.

If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served unless you receive permission from staff to leave. Slays are considered to be served once the slay takes effect.

I can’t think of any way to make this shorter.

If this is also a rules discussion as opposed to just MOTD- I am once again asking the reasoning behind this, especially with regular players? Would it not serve a better punishment to be slain at the beginning of my next session as opposed to the end of this one? It doesn't evade the punishment.
I am not completely closed off to it changing. But the main reason in my opinion is that the reason for the slay is to provide some closure/justice to the person who had their round ruined. When they see the slay they feel like the event is over and wont carry over the grudge to the next session. Also it is really easy to tell the staff member that slayed you that you have to leave right then and cant wait 5 minutes (for whatever reason).
Yeah that's what I've done previously and it's never been an issue. Would just hate to see anyone end up with warn points on their permanent record for leaving post round before a report is submitted, a master+ rdming and leaving generally wouldn't be an intentional thing.


RE: New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). - TDawg4 - 01-28-2025

(01-28-2025, 06:07 PM)Market Down Wrote:
(01-28-2025, 05:17 PM)TDawg4 Wrote:
(01-28-2025, 12:03 PM)Market Down Wrote:
(01-28-2025, 11:50 AM)Ryan Wrote:
(01-27-2025, 07:13 PM)TDawg4 Wrote: Made some changes based off of suggestions. Thinking of a good way to word that slays count once you serve it without adding a whole other sentence.
If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served (you may leave once the round of your last slay has started) unless you receive permission from staff to leave.

If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served unless you receive permission from staff to leave. Slays are considered to be served once the slay takes effect.

I can’t think of any way to make this shorter.

If this is also a rules discussion as opposed to just MOTD- I am once again asking the reasoning behind this, especially with regular players? Would it not serve a better punishment to be slain at the beginning of my next session as opposed to the end of this one? It doesn't evade the punishment.
I am not completely closed off to it changing. But the main reason in my opinion is that the reason for the slay is to provide some closure/justice to the person who had their round ruined. When they see the slay they feel like the event is over and wont carry over the grudge to the next session. Also it is really easy to tell the staff member that slayed you that you have to leave right then and cant wait 5 minutes (for whatever reason).
Yeah that's what I've done previously and it's never been an issue. Would just hate to see anyone end up with warn points on their permanent record for leaving post round before a report is submitted, a master+ rdming and leaving generally wouldn't be an intentional thing.
Kinda fair, but its like a 1 month expiration and I have not seen anyone get denied for anything because of rdm and leave points. Also if you get a day ban you have to stack up 4 of those suckers.


RE: New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). - 茶 Tea - 01-28-2025

(01-28-2025, 02:17 AM)Won A Car by Gambling Wrote: Blocking someone from using a healer should be sus at minimum smh
-1

(01-28-2025, 07:26 PM)TDawg4 Wrote:
(01-28-2025, 06:07 PM)Market Down Wrote:
(01-28-2025, 05:17 PM)TDawg4 Wrote:
(01-28-2025, 12:03 PM)Market Down Wrote:
(01-28-2025, 11:50 AM)Ryan Wrote: If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served (you may leave once the round of your last slay has started) unless you receive permission from staff to leave.

If you receive slays for RDM, you must remain on the server until all of your slays are served unless you receive permission from staff to leave. Slays are considered to be served once the slay takes effect.

I can’t think of any way to make this shorter.

If this is also a rules discussion as opposed to just MOTD- I am once again asking the reasoning behind this, especially with regular players? Would it not serve a better punishment to be slain at the beginning of my next session as opposed to the end of this one? It doesn't evade the punishment.
I am not completely closed off to it changing. But the main reason in my opinion is that the reason for the slay is to provide some closure/justice to the person who had their round ruined. When they see the slay they feel like the event is over and wont carry over the grudge to the next session. Also it is really easy to tell the staff member that slayed you that you have to leave right then and cant wait 5 minutes (for whatever reason).
Yeah that's what I've done previously and it's never been an issue. Would just hate to see anyone end up with warn points on their permanent record for leaving post round before a report is submitted, a master+ rdming and leaving generally wouldn't be an intentional thing.
Kinda fair, but its like a 1 month expiration and I have not seen anyone get denied for anything because of rdm and leave points. Also if you get a day ban you have to stack up 4 of those suckers.
imo rdm+leave should be an extra slay max. unless you're mass rdming or targeting there's no other reason why rdm should be bannable


RE: New MOTD give feedback Will not listen but might. (Have until Feb 5). - TDawg4 - 01-29-2025

Added Mr. Highman's wording for when a slay is considered to be served.