Dinkleberg's GMod
Ban The Un-Communist - Printable Version

+- Dinkleberg's GMod (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site)
+-- Forum: Trouble in Terrorist Town (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: TTT Ban Requests (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+---- Forum: TTT Ban Request Archive (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=46)
+---- Thread: Ban The Un-Communist (/showthread.php?tid=5767)



Ban The Un-Communist - Cosmic Tortoise - 10-25-2018

Offender's Name: The Un-Communist

Offender's SteamID: STEAM_0:1:154267527

Potential Witnesses: Noire

Reason to Ban: Revenge and T on T rdm at the same time, RDM generally later
 
Proof: http://i65.tinypic.com/2mxhg1z.jpg

Other: I killed him the previous round, Innocent vs Traitor, then he revenge rdms me next round, T on T.  Multiple people claiming no rules since no admins


RE: Ban The Un-Communist - lacer - 10-26-2018

The best that can come from this is two (or four? for revenge rdm and intentional T-on-T) slays. Unless he constantly rdmed with no staff on.

If there's something else he did that IS bannable, let us know.


RE: Ban The Un-Communist - Gabe - 10-26-2018

This isn’t really ban worthy based on the screenshot, but it clearly shows an intentional T on T RDM with the possibility of it being a Revenge RDM.(kinda hard to prove based off one singular screenshot) I intend to add the slays(unless I find evidence for mass or consistent Rdm since you claimed he Rdmed more... next time include that please) and close this when I get home, that’s as far as I can take this thread. As far as the “multiple people claiming no rules”, if any of those people caused issues make a separate ban request for them with sufficient proof.


RE: Ban The Un-Communist - Trombowen - 10-26-2018

(10-26-2018, 03:07 PM)Gabe Wrote: This isn’t really ban worthy based on the screenshot, but it clearly shows an intentional T on T RDM with the possibility of it being a Revenge RDM.(kinda hard to prove based off one singular screenshot) I intend to add the slays and close this when I get home, that’s as far as I can take this thread. As far as the “multiple people claiming no rules”, if any of those people caused issues make a separate ban request for them with sufficient proof.

I'm going to vouch for Cosmic for it being revenge RDM. When I was joining, I caught the tail-end of the conversation between the two, and The Un-Communist said something along the lines of "you killed me, I killed you, we're even now".


RE: Ban The Un-Communist - Gabe - 10-26-2018

(10-26-2018, 03:10 PM)Trombowen Wrote:
(10-26-2018, 03:07 PM)Gabe Wrote: This isn’t really ban worthy based on the screenshot, but it clearly shows an intentional T on T RDM with the possibility of it being a Revenge RDM.(kinda hard to prove based off one singular screenshot) I intend to add the slays and close this when I get home, that’s as far as I can take this thread. As far as the “multiple people claiming no rules”, if any of those people caused issues make a separate ban request for them with sufficient proof.

I'm going to vouch for Cosmic for it being revenge RDM. When I was joining, I caught the tail-end of the conversation between the two, and The Un-Communist said something along the lines of "you killed me, I killed you, we're even now".

Noted, thank you.


RE: Ban The Un-Communist - lacer - 10-26-2018

@Gabe I'm getting on right now, I'll add the slays. This would be 4 slays for intentional T-on-T and Revenge RDM, correct?


RE: Ban The Un-Communist - Cosmic Tortoise - 10-26-2018

I'll work on more evidence for the next time then.


RE: Ban The Un-Communist - Gabe - 10-26-2018

(10-26-2018, 03:28 PM)Laced Xanax Wrote: @Gabe I'm getting on right now, I'll add the slays. This would be 4 slays for intentional T-on-T and Revenge RDM, correct?

Ya, had someone else confirm it too