[Dildo Shwaggins]

This has a point. However, in situations where there is conflict that involves every side not being entirely wrong/problematic but not also being entirely right, it has to be a civil discussion and acknowledgment by ALL of the parties involved (not necessarily both as looking at it as two sides isn’t the healthiest either). I think this community has an issue with that fairly often, and it’s important when the goal is a mutual understanding of points of view even if disagreement still occurs. This isn’t saying everyone has to be like “I’m right you’re wrong” rather “hey, I can see where you’re coming from” and reaching a point where there’s a lesson to be learned for the future even if the disagreement leaves things a bit sour. For any of this to occur, there has to be de-escalation prioritized, which is a duty of staff, to be the first goal. Then work out the details of what was said and what is problematic from there.