[bunniey]

Now for a real voice for representing femininity and the queer/lbtgq+? Who in their right mind would appoint an individual so appalling to talk down on individuals of the opposite sex when the lbtgq+ is suppose to welcome any individual with open arms regardless of their sex, gender, sexuality and stance within society's labels. Someone who has said in the past that all straight males should perish and even wished death upon an unborn child nonchalantly as if it was a mere greeting. I myself identify bisexual and acesexual and to even merely suggest someone who's actions speak and show the complete opposite of what the lbtgq+ stands for is such a slap in the face to what that organization not only stands for, but for every individual who has ever been targeted for their sexuality, gender or sex.

true, we should modify lgbtq+ to be more inclusive to cishet men! AS A BISEXUAL FEMALE, thank you for representing all of us in the queer community.

I mean a big part of it is we're largely assuming people's genders and orientations here. For example, to many I'm just a white cishet guy because...I guess they've never talked to me or something? But I'm in reality notably native, very bi, and only use he/him pronouns because they fit me as I currently see myself better, but I'm pretty much nb in everything but pronouns. But I don't really make any of that my personality, not that I hide it, if it comes up I'll talk about it. (except the nb thing that's something i only really started talking about very recently to like two people but,,,,coming out ig? fk u helen anyway)

This is a problem when you have people entirely 180ing on how they feel about how they treated someone when they thought they were male vs when they found out they were nb/trans (which is something that has happened during this whole thing) 

I don't know if that's what Starling was even kind of going for but probably just something that needs said