[Super Milk Chan]

I like your post, your drive, and your reasoning, however I’m going to be a -1 here after some deeper thought. I upvoted your post because I like so many of your ideas of how a developer discord should be run. You have some incredible ideas that would be AMAZING for the server and adding some more structure to the developer role. However-  returning  to a role after an absence and looking to jump directly to Lead Developer, completely changing the way things run on the server, and asking for co-owner isn’t a good look.

If we look at this from a professional, corporate standpoint- someone who resigns from a position, takes a leave of absence, isn’t going to come back directly to a promotion from a previous position. I would absolutely support an application for dev, reinstatement of your previous role, or a number of other moves. But I’m not willing to co-sign a promotion from resignation and inactivity.

I understand I’m just a regular user of this forum, this server, and I don’t know a lot of the things that happened in the years I was gone. Some people here know and love you, but I don’t know a thing about your staffing beyond the controversy mentioned earlier in this post. I hope to get to know you, and change this vote in the future.

Maybe the role could do with a change of name as it seems to misleading a new ppl as to what it is. It's just moving files around and editing the layout of the dev discord. It's nothing like admin or even mod in that case. The other stuff is just stuff I already have access to separate form everything ells. People may not be super familiar with a company's structure were they normally sit due to some company's labelling what is basically a CEO as a lead developer.