[caribou]

Stoke every time he has been perma banned for hitting the max awarn threshold he has claimed he has changed in the appeal, then we unban him eventually and the cycle repeats.   

How many times of someone claiming they have changed but proving they haven't at all is enough?

I'd argue a decent chunk of those warns/bans, like the one that resulted from skullfire warning him for "harassment" which led to a perm ban, was weak as hell and and basically hypocritical harassment from the staff instead (who himself has gotten banned for actually harassing others).

You do know Caribou has literally 1 warn from Skullfire. And that warn is valid.  Additionally it is not fair to the 9 staff that have given him the 10 warns he has to be saying they were harassing him by giving him them.

yes, obviously, but my point is that framing it as "he has three permanent bans" when at least one of them is from a trash warn that put him in that range is disingenuous

All the warns he had that pushed him over the point threshold (which between this ban and the pervious perma ban he successfully appealed , had actual increased in points needed for a perma ban from awarn) were warranted.  His latest ban was mostly caused by repeatedly flaming our staff over temporarily mishandling a report. Which got him a 6 point flaming warn, pushing him over the 32 point threshold.

The interaction in which I flamed a staff member over mishandling a report was never really explained to me, I don't remember what exactly happened. Can you explain it to me please?