[Jammin]

-1 to eam, they should appeal themselves if they care. Also incredibly obvious they were teaming.

Is rust rock a t weapon? That would impact my opinion.

I now understand rust rock to be a melee substitute.

I am not aware of any situation where there is an obligation to kill players in some order. It sounds like d33r was not aware of, consenting to, or otherwise supporting their revival as an innocent, but was aware Eam did the revival.

D33r then killed members of the opposing team - known traitor "The Guest" (i'm guessing this is Lil peepo?) and known traitor Eam.
To call this teaming is stretching things - in fact, I would argue, that standing there doing nothing is more akin to teaming than killing members of the opposite team.

I'd like to see a video - being revived by a T as an inno usually only ends in immediate death. I don't blame someone for running from the revival spot then taking out traitors. Perhaps Peepo was in the area that d33r ran off to? How do we know that Peepo wasn't staring down D33r with a long gun?

It appears to me that D33r and Eam were trying to have their own rock fight, and did so both at the beginning and the end of the round in question. I don't see how this is teaming anymore than a consensual prop fight.

I think not immediately killing Eam, in order to engage with the rock fight, IS teaming - minor teaming. Just as any prop fight is minor teaming.
I am a +1 for conversion of the warning to Minor Teaming. If proof can be shown that Peepo was not in the area, and that D33r sought peepo out, then severe teaming has a better argument.