[d33r]

-1 to you
kinda went out of your way to kill the person who killed you instead of the person who defibbed you. comparing your situation to others doesn't make yours any less bad.

-1 to eam
initiated the teaming by defibbing you + initiated the teaming with puppys, however in puppys case she was not intentionally teaming therefore she shouldn't even be in this post. if anything, you just posted another reason why he shouldn't be unbanned lol

I want the main takeaway of me mentioning other situations that this specific one was only reported because of my staff app. It really feels like Caribou, Lil Pleepo, HONG even, and Frost are really going out of their way to try and catch me out on something or going out of their way to say something rude and hateful to me. Which is also why I mentioned caribou saying "rip staff app too" because I don't feel that it was reported for anything other than to put me down. I know for a fact you've been on several times when I've revived an innocent for fun but I wasn't ever warned for that by you or anyone. I know many people have seen something like this happen yet of all the ones I know that got reported this one got reported with a low pop of 7 people. 

Plus when Lil Pleepo joined our vc later on after Eamtomlinson he went to argue with us about how the logic of the situation was telling me that I have to kill the defiber first. I hadn't heard that before and from the rules that are currently being explained to me it doesn't matter who you kill if you kill anyone its teaming. So anytime Love4Puppies has been revived and killed the defiber where are her warns for it? I doubt anyone reported her or the person reviving her or would report them. This just feels extremely targeted at me specifically, especially when Lil Pleepo was asking Eamtomlinson if the accuser decided not to give the warn would he stay and not give his items away. With again the many times I've seen people revive their friends and it ends up killing their T-Buddies or just them I've never seen a single report on it. Now maybe those reports end up in private but I'd love to see them. Including as I was talking to some other people and it really sounds like theres a vendetta against certain people via this group of people. Especially when I was freshly unbanned I would always revive uriel and I was never told not to do that I was only told to stop giving him T-weapons.

It's just like when I thought bold booze wasn't kosable because I had never seen someone kos for it until someone randomly shot me that one time because as monkey see monkey do. I had only ever seen people say its "sus" so overtime I always assumed it was only sussable. like also how bggames gaslit me into thinking that cooking a grenade is kosable and when he was completely wrong he didn't even apologize for when it got me slain. I feel thrown under the bus when stuff like this happens because I'm made to think something that isn't true in the rules and then when I try to appeal its always just "you're wrong". It doesn't feel like its my fault when this happens, I just get used as an example while facing all of the consequences of the actions caused by other people. 

Also to clarify I'm not arguing the rules as they are written, I'm arguing that of the possibly hundreds of times this has happend where the inno kills the Ts on revive. I was singled out even seperate from Eamtomlinson. While I may logically think that I should kill both the traitors if given a second chance, I can infact see what the staff guidelines and TTT Rules say so theres no need to keep repeating it.

Also to answer "If proof can be shown that Peepo was not in the area, and that D33r sought peepo out" for Jammin. Lil pleepo was still right next to where me and Eamtomlinson were by the greenhouse on dinkleberg, If he hadn't been still next to us I probably wouldn't have killed him as we would have easily kept fighting. Yet when I was revived I knew he would have just killed me again if he saw me. Though it sounds like I would have also been reported for killing Eamtomlinson anyway.