[Dinkleberg >:(]

Revenge RDM has been 2 slays for a while now. I can't say whether it was a written rule or not, but regardless, that's the guideline the staff followed for 2+ years. Why do an instant switch now and blindside the staff?

I know that your argument is that dink does things to blindside staff (w/o warning, etc..).  I agree somethings he adds w/o our knowledge can be sketch, but this rule change isnt as big as it is made out to be, and we should not be enraged at something like this.

My argument isn't that Dink does things to blindside the staff, my argument is that the new rule is unnecessary. I won't deny that Dink does blindside the staff with stuff sometimes (this being one of them) but that's not my main point in this thread.

This isn't a new rule, it's simply the removal of an old rule that applied in very few situations and caused a lot of confusion. I try to update things in the changelog when I do them, especially major ones.

I didn't want to really stick my nose in this but T on T, intentional RDM happens more often than you think. A slap on the wrist for intentional T on T doesn't really give them time to think about stuff like, "Hey, maybe I shouldn't be a retarded snowflake and RDM my buddies.". No literal offense, but Dink you just come on to try and fix things, you don't staff. Not everyone knows how to play the game or particularly cares for the rules of the game. You can't expect people to have common sense either.

I'm still going to have to enforce it even though I personally think it is stupid and hopefully Admins will be able get it reverted.

I agree with you guys and I think that intentional T on T rdm is not okay and probably does happen more than I think. I think it deserves more than a slay, but I don't want to have situations where 2 slays are given out due to the confusion and rule bending this has caused