No It’s Rdm and leave. Both needed. If they were to appeal and see this ban request as evidence used they could use it to their advantage for missing part. What if it wasn’t actually Rdm they were slayed for? How do we know it was Rdm? What if it was a “joke slay?” Etc. Too many unanswered and disputable questions that are good to squash at the time of banning. We ban based on hard evidence, not assumptions. All parts are needed and it’s not that hard to collect both. We ALWAYS want sufficient evidence that covers all parts and beyond a reasonable doubt is the goal.
If the staff on can confirm it then sure. Seeing as porky was the one who handled the report it would have to be him
If the staff on can confirm it then sure. Seeing as porky was the one who handled the report it would have to be him