01-28-2020, 12:13 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-30-2020, 01:13 AM by Nicol Bolas.)
(01-28-2020, 12:05 AM)matt_st3 (Strongrule) Wrote:(01-28-2020, 12:01 AM)SNAK Wrote: +1 for Gabe becoming head admin/COowner, whatever you want to call it. He composes himself well and think would do good in the position, infact, I already consider him to be the acting leader as of right know. This server needs proper direction, and I believe he can be it.
A counterpoint, should any admin be a coowner at this point? A discussion has been brought up that no admin is currently active. A coowner has technical responsibility past an admin, and with it more access. So this is a plus assuming the CO is active. In terms of voting, a coowner has the same say.
I mean I suppose, but then who else? As I said in the previous thread, there isn't really anyone who can replace inactive admins besides basically me and that applies to a co-owner as well. This would make sense if we had more than 2-ish active moderators. Rotating staff only works when there are enough staff to warrant such a change.