[Minder]

For number 2, I disagree with mainly because if you kill a traitor and pick up a t weapon and you say you are proven, and someone kills you for that it should still be rdm and punishable.

Because anyone can say they're proven. There needs to be some kind of objective rules-wise delineation of what makes a player proven vs unproven, and a detective's word is an easy fix.

I do see what you are saying though about split second reactions when someone pulls out a deadly weapon nexts to you though but mistakes like that can happen and it should still be slayable.

Why? It's absurd that when someone pulls a knife on you, the rules force you to scroll up in chat and check their proven status (or simply have encyclopedic and instantly-recallable knowledge of who is proven in the given round.) No one would ever survive a knife or a jihad again if everyone complied with this.