[KaptainLes]

Half the current trusteds don't even staff when on so why does that only apply to GAMER?

I not going to +1 this post obviously, but I will remain neutral for the reason that KneeGee said. Not limited to trusted either, all levels of staff as of the last few months. 

Seems somewhat hypocritical to just disregard this application in that sense. Why are some staff allowed to disregard the rules and guidelines and how the general flow of staffing works that is now ok? If this is the new acceptable style I don't see an issue with gamers' staffing style currently. 

In my personal opinion I highly disagree with gamers' style of staffing, he shouldn't be staff. I could have -1ed but for me to do that now would feel wrong. I don't like being hypocritical.

Gamer makes some good points and has answered responses well. One point of criticism I will make is if what you say is true and you did "look at the reports and decided not to take action" at the bare minimum close them out. If action is not decided on you still need to set the report to finished, even when there's no staff on as it notifies the player that you have finished looking at their report. That should at least be a minimum in terms of staffing and requires only 2 extra clicks if you are indeed actually looking at the reports. If you can do that, at least you wouldn't be accused of not looking at them entirely.

Best of luck with your app.