Offender's Name: Foxka
Offender's SteamID: STEAM_0:0:20327192
Offender's Rank: Trusted
What They Did: I was falsely slain because I killed Monekydog57. I killed monkey dog because I called out a traitor who was in front of him and he did not attempt to kill that traitor. (This thread explains the why [http://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/thread-1880.html])
When They Did It: 7/9/17 ~9:20 PM
Potential Witnesses: N/A
Proof: https://youtu.be/JkU2zXnQDE8
Other: my question, Considering Foxka killed two innocent's and ran away without ID'ing and Monekydog57 witnessed both kills. Is it justifiable to kill him based on that reason instead of my current reason?
Breaking down their statements:
Monekydog57's (proof): rdm noi proof i was a T the guy killed was latter blocking the sec guy I didn't see him kill
1. http://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/thread-1880.html is a valid reason to kill you
Foxka (proof): You KOSd both of us at the same time, not to mention I was away from him when i killed the person on the ladder. This was sus a
[url=https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/842587364844873544/9F9AF19E55276D5DBB1F3810AB104813C8FCB0F9/][/url]
1. "You KOSd both of us at the same time," No. I did not call you both at the same time. I called you out first and then Monkeydog57.
2. "not to mention I was away from him when i killed the person on the ladder" No. You were blatantly in front of him.
3. "This was sus a" were you going to say, this was a sus at best? Because it is not according to the replies on http://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/thread-1880.html
Offender's SteamID: STEAM_0:0:20327192
Offender's Rank: Trusted
What They Did: I was falsely slain because I killed Monekydog57. I killed monkey dog because I called out a traitor who was in front of him and he did not attempt to kill that traitor. (This thread explains the why [http://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/thread-1880.html])
When They Did It: 7/9/17 ~9:20 PM
Potential Witnesses: N/A
Proof: https://youtu.be/JkU2zXnQDE8
Other: my question, Considering Foxka killed two innocent's and ran away without ID'ing and Monekydog57 witnessed both kills. Is it justifiable to kill him based on that reason instead of my current reason?
Breaking down their statements:
Monekydog57's (proof): rdm noi proof i was a T the guy killed was latter blocking the sec guy I didn't see him kill
1. http://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/thread-1880.html is a valid reason to kill you
Foxka (proof): You KOSd both of us at the same time, not to mention I was away from him when i killed the person on the ladder. This was sus a
[url=https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/842587364844873544/9F9AF19E55276D5DBB1F3810AB104813C8FCB0F9/][/url]
1. "You KOSd both of us at the same time," No. I did not call you both at the same time. I called you out first and then Monkeydog57.
2. "not to mention I was away from him when i killed the person on the ladder" No. You were blatantly in front of him.
3. "This was sus a" were you going to say, this was a sus at best? Because it is not according to the replies on http://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/thread-1880.html
Life is finite.
