(09-28-2018, 08:17 AM)King Tiger Ace Fasda22 Wrote: Killing an innocent is not a reason to KOS. Killing an innocent for NO REASON is a reason to KOS. I didnt think thats THAT difficult to conceive? Genuinly whats so bloody difficult about that.
Not to mention only thing I see from you is you walking in on a gunfight, with a man that says he was attacked BY the innocent dead guy. You SUSPECT he's lying and kill him. Most important word: SUSPECT. You're killing him out of suspicion, wich as we all know, is RDM. Not. That. Fucking. Difficult.
that wouldnt be suspecting anything that would be killing him for killing an inno because you have zero proven evidence that that inno had attempted to kill the guy. How are you supposed to assume the guy is telling the truth? If you dont see someone kill someone you can only put sus on them. So in any case that an rdm happens and no one can see you, you cant be kosed for it unless if the detective gets dna because otherwise nothing can be proven unless you get kosed by the rdmer. So realistically 80% of the time this rule will be enforced when a detective gets dna on an rdmer. Which detectives do all the time.
