[Jammin]

Anything involving rules/etc are really on me and should face the blame onto me. A lot of the controversial bans recently have been valid, though quickly forgiven, bans.
Even though we just did an overhaul of the rules, I'm seeing the issues the new guidelines are presenting. We probably need to form them so that they better read into a person's intent when posting something.

That being said, if I tag a channel as NSFW, then how the hell do we know that everyone going into that channel is 18+? We have a very limited audience in our fitness channel - members who are pre-screened and whom we know are 18 or older. These members are "trusted" enough to not lie about their age.
But to establish a more standard method of determine one's age, we'd have to have a system to weed out those lying about their age. A server I was part of in the past was taken down because a 16 year old lied about their age and joined an NSFW channel - then reported the server to discord. That's why i'm very zero-tolerance on some of these issues, especially those involving information minors have access to.

All of THAT being said, yes we should probably ensure that for even these major issues, that we ensure the intent was a misunderstanding of the rules, and not an intentional attempt to violate TOS (such as the kebab incident). Thanks for the feedback, i'll take a closer look over the next few days.

One thing i'd like to point out is that the server is by no means being influenced by the "PH crowd." I made it a mission to give PH a fighting chance to participate in conversation outside of their own channel. While I don't think i've succeeded exactly, i feel progress is made there. The TTT channel is available for the more rowdy conversations - and I don't think there is any way you can argue we "over-moderate" conversation there.