[Avi]

Im going to post what I posted in the Discord because it fits well here:
I just want to put it out there that there has always been a precedent that members were allowed to give an opinion on staff applications by messaging an admin privately for them to take their vote into consideration.
Now directly having the admin post on the thread is a newer concept, but if someone can make a comment and prove to the admin that they are honest in their opinion of said applicant, then there should be no issue in anonymous voting.
An admin shouldn't post it if they have reason to believe that there is biased opinion or it's blatantly a lie, so if people think that anonymous claims are outlandish or exaggerated, talk to the admin that posted it, don't throw shade in your own votes. There's a couple of instances of that now and I'd like people to consider why those people feel worried about what they want to say that they are inclined to go to an admin in the first place.