[reinaberg]

I do agree with you that context is important, and I believe that if there was evidence it should be posted redacted (as in the case of harassment bans evidence).  I would say however that Gabe laid out my beliefs pretty well in his response when it comes to anonymous posts in general.  I just took issue with the idea that everyone who posts criticism anonymously should not be allowed to do and should be forced to put themselves out in public, thereby just removing that opinion from the discussion.

i feel as though my words are falling on deaf ears. again, i have no problem with anonymous posts in general. i just disagree with letting someone using a proxy to anonymously give vague and unconstructive criticism without any clarification as to what situation they're referring to. this doesn't necessarily mean screenshots or videos, just describing an example of the behavior would suffice in my opinion. accusing someone of doing something bad without giving an example for people to decide whether or not they agree with your interpretation of their actions seems unproductive. i don't feel as though it opens up their issue to discussion between the applicant and others responding to the app, it only leads to confusion and a bad taste being left in people's mouths without the applicant being able to properly give their thoughts on the subject.