[Damien]

I feel like from the description from the OP alone that the targeting warn is valid since they did say they wanted to and were going to single out a single person for multiple rounds and basically did. The targeting warn should be all about intent imo and I think that the warn is valid. I'm waiting on evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Nazu is the guilty party (if there is one) to cast a vote but if there isn't then it's a -1 for any serious action towards Nazu. If they handled their own report without other staff on then that's excusable if it was a slayable reason but otherwise there should be a talking to with Nazu.