[Scoovie]

The logic that all of them should be blanket banned for "reasons(the can't be shared kind apparently)," association/being friends, and comments from a separate discord is ridiculous. It would be one thing if they were making memes of community members like certain people were doing to rippe back in the day, but wild for an example had a negative opinion of dink and he's classified as part of a "toxic hivemind" and needs to be banned? But people who have been problems for years are still here/been unbanned.

The evidence provided was taken from a PRIVATE discord and out of context and used to make people look bad over weeks-months, which would make anyone look bad. If the "problem" has been solved there should be no reason not to post ALL of the evidence. If people are to scared to share their evidence on an online forum how will they do it in real life?

Saying that 4 admins coming to a unanimous vote based on evidence that can't be shared and that we should trust that they came to the right decision has been proven in the past not to mean anything, like for example when Dakody and the admins at the time banned fozzy for hacking, they were proven very wrong. From what I hear jaun and dakota weren't apart of this decision and that gabe wanted to wait. And as far as I know no one was approached and told to stop by the admins.

This was clearly not thought out all the way or it would have been done in a much better manner, everything would have been laid out individually on a case by case basis. This just feels like it was done in a hurry and "to get it done" and hope no one notices. Which is clearly shown by the backpedaling and damage control that is being done after the fact.

Talking shit in private discords is allowed as shown below.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/6...apture.PNG