[A Steel Waffle]

Offender's Name: Setro

Offender's SteamID: STEAM_0:0:41750005 

Offender's Rank: T-Mod

What They Did: They had slain me for something that no one had any knowledge about. I was slain because my report was inconsistent I said I followed a KOS but never did the KOS I was slain for a false KOS and no one even knew who it was Warpizzle me and several others were almost positive it was rememberme kid I am unhappy I took the slay I simply followed the kos and i said in the report well bman had to have done something traitorous in order for the supposed person to KOS him. I dont demand a demotion just an appology and for him and other staff members to be trained better in this in the future
When They Did It: 10:30-11:00 on the map dolls round 3 

Potential Witnesses: Warpizzle, Hoodieninja (had video of 2 people talking at the time of the KOS), Lego  

Proof: well i dont have the report but heres the slay

Other:

[lance (2)]

You did not explain you were following a KOS in the response. Your response made no sense and you did not counter any of the claims made in the report, so I slayed you because you seemed to have no reason to kill him. Death scene didn't show anything either.
Had you put in your response you were following a KOS, or told me right after I added the slay, I wouldn't slay you. But when you go out on a limb and say he was doing something "traitorous" without explanation of what he did, I kinda have to slay you because it makes it seem like you had no idea what made you kill him. 
You told me all about how you were 'following a KOS' and all a round after you were slain.

[donkeyskin1]

hey you followed the format.... good job. proud of ya.

[Mr_Rippe]

Setro was in the right here. You need to articulate that you were following a KOS in your response. The Mod acted correctly with the info he had available at the time. This one's on you.

[Scoovie]

It's very important that you include ALL of the information in the response to a rdm report. Staff are not mind readers.

[A Steel Waffle]

Alright So me simply saying I didn't call the KOS isn't enough because everyone even me was curious as to who called the KOS I just followed it hoodie says someone else said it but hey what do I know I'm no mod

---

Well my report is something even I don't understand regardless I said I did...nt :) and was slain for following the KOS

[lance (2)]

Alright So me simply saying I didn't call the KOS isn't enough because everyone even me was curious as to who called the KOS I just followed it hoodie says someone else said it but hey what do I know I'm no mod

---

Well my report is something even I don't understand regardless I said I did...nt :) and was slain for following the KOS

This isn't what we're saying, we're saying you didn't include that you were following a KOS in the response to the report.

[A Steel Waffle]

You did not explain you were following a KOS in the response. Your response made no sense and you did not counter any of the claims made in the report, so I slayed you because you seemed to have no reason to kill him. Death scene didn't show anything either.
Had you put in your response you were following a KOS, or told me right after I added the slay, I wouldn't slay you. But when you go out on a limb and say he was doing something "traitorous" without explanation of what he did, I kinda have to slay you because it makes it seem like you had no idea what made you kill him. 
You told me all about how you were 'following a KOS' and all a round after you were slain.

[TDawg4]

One problem that I see and I have done is putting limited info into reports. If you say things like "you were a t" ect how do you expect the staff to not slay you. If you want the staff to get it right put as much info as possible into reports.

[A Steel Waffle]

So I guess me saying something 3 rounds ahead of time is the time after I was slain you not listening doesn't constitute me being slain I had said this for the 4 rounds u investigating