[lacer]

I agree with you, but we have people with twice as many bans as that and for similar or even more egregious offenses. It just seems like the suggestion to have him be temporarily permagagged and then appeal that gag to be a more concise and reasonable suggestion than to deny this appeal outright.

I've never liked other people's bans setting the precedent for future unbans unless it's something cut and dry like hacking. That being said, I lean more towards just denying this appeal because I saw all of Timbo's history firsthand and he just went right back to doing the same stuff he was before. It wasn't just micspam, which is why I think a permagag wouldn't do much to keep him from breaking the rules. 

But maybe I'm wrong and a permagag would be all that's needed. I guess only time will tell.