[Icey]

Hi, I don't view this as a competition at all, and I wouldn't mind both applicants being accepted.

However, I still stand by what I wrote. I was not given any extra insight into anyone's private conversations except for what was posted here. You did not privately reach out to me to answer my question, and you still haven't addressed it at all, which is once again, the exact issue I was pointing out in my original post.

Neglecting feedback and genuine questions being asked to you when you're applying to be a communicative, community facing admin, isn't a good look and has made me even less willing to support you in this.

Hey bab. Referring back to your response. "The issue that Pluto mentioned above is also concerning, what steps are you willing to take to correct the previous stonewalling in the future?"
I could be wrong, but that is implying that I stonewalled pluto in the first place. And considering the -1 was only a couple of hours after pluto's inital response, I can assume that you didn't intend on waiting for a rebuttal before placing your -1. I am also perfectly content with players -1ing based off something that someone says. I believe even more firmly that I like to see proof and evidence of what happened before making my decision. Regardless, for anyone interested in knowing the situation, I have been and will continue to explain and show the conversation. Thank you for the comment! I think the point I want to make has been made so if anyone wants to address things further, my DM's are open and I'll try to answer any questions.