[☁ Pluto]

-snip-

Hey bab. Referring back to your response. "The issue that Pluto mentioned above is also concerning, what steps are you willing to take to correct the previous stonewalling in the future?"
I could be wrong, but that is implying that I stonewalled pluto in the first place. And considering the -1 was only a couple of hours after pluto's inital response, I can assume that you didn't intend on waiting for a rebuttal before placing your -1. I am also perfectly content with players -1ing based off something that someone says. I believe even more firmly that I like to see proof and evidence of what happened before making my decision. Regardless, for anyone interested in knowing the situation, I have been and will continue to explain and show the conversation. Thank you for the comment! I think the point I want to make has been made so if anyone wants to address things further, my DM's are open and I'll try to answer any questions.

As far as it goes, applications should be the main place for you to respond to feedback. It's not as big of a deal as you're making it to reply to people on the forums as long as you are concise with your reasoning to prevent multiple back and forths (and even then, it's still not a big deal. It's a forum). Having seen you reply to a few posts on here, it seems like that isn't much of an issue for you.

"I could be wrong, but that is implying that I stonewalled pluto in the first place."
Just to be clear on this, it wasn't a question or implication that you stonewalled me--it was a fact. Now, I'm not entirely sure what parts of the conversation you are including when you send it to people, but with this statement by you, I find it possible you could be cherry-picking and not giving the full thing. This wasn't really a concern for me up until this point.

Lastly, since I am here and replying again anyways... I do find your other reply to Ryan rather strange. In your reply, you stated: "You seem to state that this is the primary reason that I -1'd tiefling, but it is just one of many. I could go back to Tieflings app and write a whole different -1, but I just don't think it accomplishes anything positive."
This is just entirely inaccurate. On tiefling's application, this was your only reason for giving her a -1. This doesn't include what I have posted in your own application. On the same note, it would absolutely be beneficial and positive to go back and reclaim your reason for your -1, as it gives actual constructive criticism on something she could work on in the future, rather than, yet again, keeping your real reasoning sheltered.