[angel]

-snip-

Hey bab. Referring back to your response. "The issue that Pluto mentioned above is also concerning, what steps are you willing to take to correct the previous stonewalling in the future?"
I could be wrong, but that is implying that I stonewalled pluto in the first place. And considering the -1 was only a couple of hours after pluto's inital response, I can assume that you didn't intend on waiting for a rebuttal before placing your -1. I am also perfectly content with players -1ing based off something that someone says. I believe even more firmly that I like to see proof and evidence of what happened before making my decision. Regardless, for anyone interested in knowing the situation, I have been and will continue to explain and show the conversation. Thank you for the comment! I think the point I want to make has been made so if anyone wants to address things further, my DM's are open and I'll try to answer any questions.

This still didn't answer my question in the slightest. I wasn't looking for a "rebuttal", I was looking for a genuine answer to my question to you. I didn't view it as an argument.

Pluto feels that you stonewalled him in your private talk and that you brushed him off, which he's stated several times. You bring up seeing evidence of the conversation, but I was not going to go out of my way to ask to see a private discussion that people clearly had an issue with being referenced publicly. You chose not to respond to either of us who shared this concern and instead only -1'd both posts to show "disagreement", how would I have any way of knowing what went down without breaching the confidentiality that people have been advocating for?

The very first line of my reply was, "I am -1 on this for now". Meaning that I was willing to change my opinion based (hey, look at that, we're both willing and have the capability to change our opinions) on your response to the feedback and seeing how you would adjust based on it, but the neglecting to respond or even acknowledge either of us prior, and the way you're responding to it now, has made that extremely unlikely.

So, once again, until I see improvement in these areas, I am still -1.