[Joker]

I don't think a constructive agreement is going to be found here, people are just repeating their points over and over again.
The POV of players and staff are not always going to be aligned, and that just is what it is.
The staff have the final say on the fly, no amount of arguing is going change that.

What CAN be constructively done at this point is to begin a conservation (elsewhere) to discuss how we can remove the possibility of situations like this frustrating people in the future. A change to the rules? A change to response by players and staff? A change to how springtraps work entirely?
If it's a situation the OP is this concerned about those are avenues to go down.
This as is, is going nowhere.

Amazing perspective, I wish it was viewed more as this but unfortunatly ego and biases play a role regardless of what's said it's human nature.

@Jack (2) When someone doesn't understand one way, explain it another. I can only break it down so simple when video evidence isn't enough, I apologize for attempting to explain in word format what's happening in the video that you clearly did and were upset that its so obvious when you watch it happen otherwise you wouldn't have been a T and would have been an Inno if we're going off baseless hypotheticals that are only relevant for others. No I'm not going to wait to watch you do it multiple times when im confident in the call of watching you do something when I know what I saw just as with anything else just because something happens fast doesn't mean people don't see it, that's a really lame excuse. 

Unfortunatly Roach I feel as nothing will be done as it's a popular move to chaulk it up to "Let people kill the inno's because it ruins THEIR fun if you understand the game too much" otherwise as "Shit happens". "have fun" apparently is definitive and only 1 perspective of what one qualifies as "fun".

"You need to watch it spring someone" was a reason I was given, yet I watched jack spring it on someone and just happened to do everything that lines up with him hitting them with a spring mine on a magneto stick?

In the voice of constructive criticism, what do you think is needed to be changed, specifically? As the rules currently stand, your kill was a kill on sus. You saw someone look a certain direction and then someone went flying upwards. What would you change to make this better that wouldn’t also hinder other areas of gameplay?

Edit: I’m going to open this question up to everyone. What can be changed from this situation? Shoudl anything be changed from this situation?

It would nice if we could take into account circumstantial evidence, which is what happened here.

You can piece together that there was a spring mine attached to the magneto stick based off of him as he said himself running up to him and sending him flying which should be no different than "placing" a spring mine at someone feet when you can clearly tell that that's what happened or he would have been an inno according to these random hypotheticals of "you don't know that" when clearly I do or it wouldn't have happened. This results in them getting killed so I see little to no difference in them adding a magneto stick to the mix in a vain attempt to get around the kos. If something happens enough to where people know what happend other's shouldn't have to limit themselves because they don't know what happened. Ultimately this comes down to a niche that will keep happening and getting defended based on "how the rules are written out" without adding cicumstantial evidence of witnessing it happen.
*even though I witnessed it*