02-16-2025, 04:52 AM
(02-16-2025, 04:49 AM)Peter Wrote: I censored the word "phone" to add a bit of comedic mystique, especially since the voice chat was actively discussing iPhones. The ambiguity was the joke—it could have been any five-letter word. Yet, the moderator was the only one who immediately assumed something inappropriate. I have no idea what they thought I meant, but their interpretation was entirely their own.Can you explain why the word being ambiguous makes it funny? What are some words it could be that might make it funny?
The rule prohibits explicit discussions of pedophilia, yet my censored message contained no such thing. If anything, this situation highlights an issue with how the rules are being enforced—where an innocent joke is twisted into something it was never meant to be. I shouldn’t have to justify why I censored a word when the message itself didn’t violate any rules.
