[Cryptic Salsa]

That's the scenario with a birds eye, after-the-fact view of the round. Here's how the scenario looked like to me, a player in the round:

Player B claims that Player A crowbarred him. Player B calls a KOS on Player A. Player A is killed, and identified as innocent. Player B called a KOS on an innocent - a traitorous action by any definition. Player C kills Player B.

What's stopping me from being a T and killing people, then claiming that they did something to me to make it justified? Should other players in the round who KOS/kill me roll the dice on whether or not I am a T that should be killed, or an innocent that had justified reasons to kill people and therefore hold a potential slay over your head if I feel maligned enough to report them?

thats the thing you cant kill people for defending themself either but you dont really know what happened first in that case you cant do anything to help it you just have to let them live unless someone else saw it and says thats not what happened