10-30-2021, 08:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-30-2021, 09:06 AM by Foxka. Edited 1 time in total.)
Not worth a ban, doesn't violate discord TOS, and he was just protesting the unneeded slow mode that was enabled for far too long. I personally agree +1 unban and talk to whichever discord mod issued the strike about what the discord ToS actually is regarding threats of imaginary activity
For reference: this would be the only thing that could be used in order to carry about this ban, as copy/pasted from discords community guidelines
Do not make threats of violence or threaten to harm others. This includes indirect threats, as well as sharing or threatening to share someone’s private personal information (also known as doxxing).
He did not threaten violence or harm, it's a gray area so therefore not worth a strike or a ban. TY for coming to my TED talk
For reference: this would be the only thing that could be used in order to carry about this ban, as copy/pasted from discords community guidelines
Do not make threats of violence or threaten to harm others. This includes indirect threats, as well as sharing or threatening to share someone’s private personal information (also known as doxxing).
He did not threaten violence or harm, it's a gray area so therefore not worth a strike or a ban. TY for coming to my TED talk
We're just a giant ass
Cheeks are made of children
Old was just a fad
Shit on all the billions
Cheeks are made of children
Old was just a fad
Shit on all the billions
