[Salty]

Now, I want to debate the necessity of forum activity and discord activity, both things I consider to be not necessarily fully indicative of a players potential to be staff. Sure, psychomike lacks decent forum activity and/or discord activity, along with ban requests, however this is all something that can be changed within 5 mins, I do not think it's necessarily a negative characteristic. If we do not hold lack of forum activity/discord activity against staff, especially the inactive ones, why do we hold it against somebody who will be active? We have staff (inactive) that have not posted a message on the forums or discord in months, let alone years, why hold it against somebody who is actually here? Shouldn't we focus on those who ARE a member of the staff team and lack activity? I think we need to go through the staff team and eliminate inactive people, especially if we are rejecting people who want to be staff for criteria that inactive staff are not filling.

Euphoria, I normally would agree with you but the reason why I find it an issue in this case is that there may be staff members who’ve not interacted with Mike, therefore it becomes a  trust issue. Your argument about inactive stuff I totally agree with, it’s just that since there’s a possibility that a lot of staff members haven’t interacted with him in game might not feel as if they can trust him. I 
that makes sense.


Also, I think that second bit would be great to bring up at the TTT town hall.