[matt_st3 (Strongrule)]

To break responses, the original post, and server material down it looks like we have:
3 reported out of the committee as a whole over some combination of denied app and the validity of the votes themselves. The votes being the actual abuse in question.
Hani didn’t vote therefore didn’t break the 10 rule given by dink on server activity needed for staff app votes.
Avi voted. GT shows hours under 10. It’s usually fairly accurate but take that as you will, it’s what is presented currently.
Gabe voted. He didn’t dispute. GT shows under 10.
That’s the barebones on the specific case. Otherwise it was apparently discussed that Avi was ok to vote. That and looking at server material, the denial is valid based on the principle of ignoring warnings about power misuse but that’s not on me to judge just the response.
Really it looks like common practice vs a rule on voting in general.
Did I miss anything relevant to the specific vote?