[squid]

I was only the banning staff member. I did not look over any of the evidence prior to banning. This was only brought to my attention last night and after looking it over, I believe that it was a misunderstanding and GCubed should not have been banned in the first place.

The way GCubed described it is exactly how it happened in game. Round logs show GCubed did not fire a single bullet. GCubed did nothing to aid the innocents, if anything he just looks like a bad T buddy. GCubed pulls out a c4, shows it to a bunch of innocents. One innocent tries to kill GCubed and Rylo then protects. GCubed then runs away, Rylo follows shortly after and kills another innocent, trying to protect GCubed again. GCubed did not shoot once, he did not ask for Rylo's help, nor did he help the innocents in any way.

This situation can be perfectly compared to someone saying all the T's in @ chat. You can't ban all the staff members for seeing the information? Action should only be taken on the receiving side if the information is used and not reported. The information was unsolicited, and only one person is breaking the rules. In this case GCubed is thrown in there along with the person breaking the rules because it's assumed he's guilty by association. It appears only one side is at fault here, and GCubed should be unbanned.

+1