07-22-2021, 11:39 PM
I was loosely asked for my opinion on this since I'm a cheater, so I'll say the same thing here as I did on discord:
Only the first video of evidence is of any use, and the rest boil down to lag.
If I were the person gathering evidence, I would have gathered more, and wouldn't have banned based on what I'd already had.
In general: the evidence presented is not enough. As to whether or not he was actually hacking-- again, the evidence really isn't enough for me to say.
Remaining neutral but I don't think a ban was originally prudent or appropriate based on the evidence collected.
As for any behavioral issues, it's kind of hard to tell if he's learned from his original mistakes involving toxicity, slurs, etc. without unbanning him. Take that as you will.
Only the first video of evidence is of any use, and the rest boil down to lag.
If I were the person gathering evidence, I would have gathered more, and wouldn't have banned based on what I'd already had.
In general: the evidence presented is not enough. As to whether or not he was actually hacking-- again, the evidence really isn't enough for me to say.
Remaining neutral but I don't think a ban was originally prudent or appropriate based on the evidence collected.
As for any behavioral issues, it's kind of hard to tell if he's learned from his original mistakes involving toxicity, slurs, etc. without unbanning him. Take that as you will.
