[happy]

This isn’t final say on the thread but here’s what I’m reading. 

An AFK player is standing next to Unid’d body. Player nick knows the player is AFK and still kills him because of an Unid’d body being next to it. Heres my stance on the rule. I believe the slay is justified for one reason. The rule states that if a player KNOWINGLY walks by an Unid’d body it can be kosable. This afk doesn’t know their is a body next to them because they aren’t playing the game at the moment lol. 

This is a heavy -1 and players shouldn’t get this upset over 1 slay.

1) To be more precise, I knew there were 2 afks earlier in the round on the roof, then left the roof and came back to it later. On the way I passed by another one player who was afk but wasnt anymore. When I got to the door, the other player was standing by it and there was an unID'd about 2-3 feet to the right. I killed him for being next to an unID'd body and not IDing it.
2) The ACT itself of not IDing bodies near you and could reasonably see is traitorous, with some exceptions such as body bomb or fighting traitors. This has been a general rule for the game since it came out, its just common sense. There is no logical reason to not ID bodies unless you are a traitor or there is a specific reason in game that renders you incapable of IDing the body. In this situation, there is no in game reason for not IDing the body; its two feet away, no obstacles. Not being at your keyboard isnt an in-game reason.
3) If you're going to stick to not killing AFK's then when I get back on the server, kill 5 innocent on my traitor round, then go AFK next to 5 unID'd bodies, the person I report better get slain for killing me. If they dont, im blowing my brains out at your absolutely ludicrous view on the situation.
4) This isnt entirely about the slay anymore, its about the rule/policy itself

dang kinda like dna a thing tho