[lacer]

+1, 8 points is a bit heavy for a misplaced joke.

I understand the need for consistency among moderators, but this system still needs a bit of tuning.
Here the intent to make a pedo joke was not here, just a stupid joke said without thinking and only realizing directly after how stupid it was.

There should be more room for discretion in application of warning points tbh(4 points if the intent wasn't there for a pedo joke for example?), As it currently is someone spending effort and time to harass someone gets less of a punishment than someone accidentally posting aniome without using brain by accident

If you don't think before you decide to say something, fully knowing it's against the rules, that's your fault. It's not the rules' fault nor is it the fault of the people who wrote them. A decision was made to make this joke and he was punished as a result. It'd be the same as if anyone else did it.

Don't know what you're getting at with the part about harassment being treated lighter than "aniome" but uh

Harassment is at the very least an 8 point warn. Also a reminder that warn thresholds do not mean you can't be banned for longer than whatever the threshold says.

edit: Saw the edited comment. Harassment is again, at least, an 8 point warn, the same as this one. Sexual harassment is 10 points, 2 more than this one.