[Faber]

Full Video:

https://archive.org/details/prop-hunt-11...-a-corrily

What I see is as was mentioned.

Yes, Corrilly used the gag command on a player. He did verbally warn them I think at least 2 times.
No, he did not post his MOTD. Whether use of 1 or the other matters is unknown to me.
---
Yes, Loki warned them in chat. No, it was not a MOTD. Again, whether it matters IDK.
---
Yes, Corrilly said for Carson to deal with it or he would.
No, it doesn't seem like a threat. Honestly, this is just Corrilly. It's just his personality. Some people disagree with it, some people don't. That is just the reality of the people on Earth.
---
Yes, Corrilly did gag after Loki said he was going to deal with it "pretty soon here." While the message felt vaguely like an answer to someone else, he did mean he was going to start dishing out punishment.
---
No, Corrilly shouldn't get a full removal.
No, Corrilly shouldn't really receive a strike in my non-admin opinion.
Yes, his history might play a factor in the end result.

Corrilly and I are not tight pals. Yes, we are Steam friends but that is because I find him to be a funny player sometimes. Obviously, this factors into my bias about what should happen. While it hurts to admit this, and forgive me Corrilly, I think a warning could go. 3 strikes and you're out is serious as it is. Had he already received 1 strike makes it all the more disheartening to see mentioned over such a minor case. Corrilly seems to have been a donor for a very long time. If he has only ever donated once and kept his role through the entirety of time up to this point, then he must be doing something right or not doing enough wrong.

As far as a serious offense to the rules goes, I would deem this very minor. For its kind, it has a couple of hurdles in justifying either party's side. To Loki, Corrilly seemed threatening. To me, and maybe others, Corrilly just seems like Corrilly helping in a manner in which might even be present with staff absent. I can see how it could feel from Loki's POV. Getting to know Corrilly has the same advantage. Surely, Corrilly likely intended to be helpful for the sake of everyone. He may have overlooked your statement in chat about taking action shortly after.

Again, if he really already has 1 strike and you are out in 3, I really don't think THIS particular case should qualify for a strike.