[tiefling lesbian]

*snip*

snip

Except they are and the fact you aren't willing to admit and instead would rather dig your head deeper in the sand shows that you aren't ready for staffing.  Just look at birddog, it took you 4 replies to say sorry and admit that you were wrong and apologize. In fact, I suspect you don't actually care and just apologized so it would look good because you then went after him again in his response to Cimag, trying to equate you wishing death on his kid, a directed attack, to him joking about killing people in general, which, apart from being just a false equivalency, shows you didn't actually learn from what was said.

Then look at Skullfire, you took 1 reply before you brought up Kaiwan in an attempt to make Skullfire look bad. It is a thread about you not him, you spent 1.5 replies defending yourself and 4.5 attacking Skullfire and other staff members. You brought up a completely irrelevant event that is a discussion for another thread in an attempt to malign the characters of those who don't agree with you.  That is not defending yourself, that is attacking other members of the community and you know that, and if not then it just brings forward more character issues of not being self-aware enough to realize when you are attacking which, if you get staff, will cause more harm than good. I seriously wonder if anyone continuing to give you a +1 after is able to look past their friendship with you and their desire to have a friend staffing with them and see the serious personality issues that you being staff would bring.  If you are staff you will end up causing more harm than good through your inability to accept criticism in a healthy way and I am 100% confident in that.

Again, no, providing context to a situation is not attacking anyone. The topic dragged on longer than intended, but that still doesn't make it an attack. As I said before, it was an example of common behavior that is similar or worse to what I was being accused of, with that particular example being chosen as it was the most relevant to parties involved. Further posts were to include evidence of it happening and to explain the same thing I'm having to explain again now. The point isn't to make skullfire "look bad", it's to compare what i'm being accused of to the behavior of of other staff, including the person accusing me.

The same goes for birddog. The included examples are relevant to the context in which the joke was made, and were evidence in contrary to his claim that he never makes similar jokes, which is again relevant as it falsely implies there was no previously established precedent. As I have already said, the joke was over the line, but it was still made within specific context and was not a randomly occurring event that would have happened anywhere else.

As I mentioned before, I HAVE accepted criticism and observably improved upon it, as commented on by multiple people in this thread. I have no problem with criticism so long as it is honest, accurate, and substantial, but I have every right to point out when claims against me are leaving out relevant information or being made in bad faith.

While I enjoy hanging out on the server with most of the people who have +1d, I'm not particularly close friends with them, and even people I've had conflict with in the past have +1d or +0d, so I'm not sure what point you're trying to make there. The accusations you're so confident in seem to be formed almost entirely on a handful of forum posts, as I've rarely seen you on the server at the same time as me or interacted much with you there (again, not a dig, just a relevant observation you seemed to agree with in your first post). It's possible that the people who have +1d me have simply not found the "serious personality issues" you accuse me of to be accurate or significant in their experiences with me on the server.