(07-08-2018, 02:11 PM)Aiser Wrote: I propose we change the delay rule and clarify what delay really is.What about:
As such, I suggest that delaying be: The period of time in which an alone traitor with no remaining accomplices, or accomplices that are not actively committing traitorous acts, does not kill or attempt to kill at least one innocent within a span of 3 minutes or actively participate in ending the round"
Attempts should be considered:
1. Actively firing a weapon at an innocent and or throwing explosive weaponry at innocents.
2. Placing a traitorous item that can kill near innocents (such that the item is not placed as a "trap" in the distance and not near innocents.)
3. Attempting to use a defibrillator on a T-Buddy.
Warnings should be administered at 3 minutes, and if no subsequent action is taken within 1 minute following, will result in a slay for the following round, and if greater than 2 minutes after the initial 3, an immediate round ending slay.
If anyone has any suggestions as to how this should be clarified, or any other acts that may be viewed as "attempts to kill innocents or otherwise end the round"
- Activating a T-trap that attempts to kill/damage an innocent?
- Using healing items/chicken farming to regain health?
- Playing map objectives (ex: lost temple) to win for traitors?
- Speaking in voice and/or chat in order to get innocents to kill one another? (passive kills)
Point being, the rule, in my opinion, is fine as-is. The real issue is that it is never enforced. Most staff don't want to slay for delay unless the timer literally runs to zero, at which point everyone's time is already wasted. Trolling the entire server by delaying and then only receiving a single slay almost encourages guests, minges, etc. to troll with the rule just because they know it won't be enforced.
My experience with the rule is anecdotal, of course, but I have yet to see a slay for delay in the entire time I've played on this sever, either before the round ends or after.
It's a hard rule to enforce because (I think, speculation here) it's better to wait out the player's actions than it is to immediately slay them, as it eliminates the risk of making a mistake and getting "written up" for abuse of power. So I think the rule is fine, but a little encouragement to enforce the rule is needed imo.
Any staff please chime in here if I'm off base at all.
Steam Workshop Items:
(Click name to visit on steam)
-ttt_spacepost | -ttt_limbo
Useful Information:
(Click name to view)
[Recording Demos] - [TTT Rules] - [Idiot Test]
(Click name to visit on steam)
-ttt_spacepost | -ttt_limbo
Useful Information:
(Click name to view)
[Recording Demos] - [TTT Rules] - [Idiot Test]
